Keyser Söze
Corporal
- 407
- 9
- 18
If I recall a lot of heavies who were either too lazy or didn't know how to use a STRAT, also liked to twist things to their benefit too.
Maybe if a few of them had fault finding skills that went beyond 'look there's a leak there' inter trade relationships might have been better.
This T Card reliant specialist wasn't aware that needlessly changing CSAS computers because they're easier was a valid fault finding technique either.
But back onto point the prevalent Manufacturer led myth that the BITE will tell all has been disproven over several generations of aircraft now. As systems become more and more integrated the chances of an unrelated system causing a cascade failure increases and no amount of bite button pressing will highlight this.
No matter what the BAE sales people will tell you, the fact that the MOD hierarchy believe these muppets has led to situations were the correct documentation or test equipment hasn't been procured, further leaving the service reliant on industry and causing frustration to the guys trying to do their jobs.
Currently there still are guys who have received sufficient training to be able to counteract this oversight, fast forward a decade or so however and I'm not sure the level of training the guys get now will suffice, especially if their isn't a cadre of guys with relevant 2nd line or depth experience to draw upon.
And who wins if this is indeed the case? Yup BAE who the RAF won't be able to operate without regardless of the cost to the taxpayer.
Spot on Ghandi! I recall a uni' course in the 90's where a Design Engineer (a guest speaker) from Airbus was waxing lyrical about 100% accurate BITE. I told him that I'd heard this before and it was BS then just as it is/was now. He continued that I was wrong and what did I know anyway. Roll forward 15 years where I was embedded within industry, I was chatting to the chief design engineer of a large uk defence firm, he admitted that one of their USA bidding competitors had announced to the MoD of their 100% accurate BITE, something that gave them a slight edge over my mates company,,, he admitted that they later 'fluffed up' their capability so that they ALSO had a totally accurate automated diagnostics system,,,, (they had nt) but they won the contract as a result. This guy later admitted that since there is no such thing as an accurate BITE system it was the MoDs fault for believing this BS in the first place.
Meanwhile of course the RAF have altered their whole engineering strategy on a whim to save money and not train personnel to the req'd level.
Last edited: