Oh sir said:
Bloody hell! RAF Firemen get a right roasing there don't they? And the worst bit is...... The original photo isn't even of firemen so it's undeserved! Where did they get that info from? (The original pic is pretty funny mind, only a shiney WRAF or Oggie would block up his or her ejection port like that!..... maybe?)
OhSir!
I have just posted this on arse, I will repost it here. I apologise to those that have read some of the lines elsewhere (volleyball thread), copy and paste can be good at times!
Firstly can I begin by saying that I don't go in for the whole trade bashing routine. Aunie Bettie employs us all to do a job, which is obviously still relevant to the armed forces of today. If our own individual trades were no longer relevant then they would have gone the way of the copperwrights, wheelwrights and sailmakers of the past.
I am a serving Watch Commander in the RAF Fire Service
Whilst I can't claim that the RAF Fire Service is the busiest fire service in the UK, I think most of you tend to get the wrong idea about us.
Are you aware that if an aircraft crashes, or catches fire, anywhere on the airfield we have only two minutes to deploy, and a further one minute to make survivable conditions?
If an aircraft is still alight after three minutes there is no hope of survival for anyone on board. This is one of the key reasons why we appear to do very little during flying hours, there is very little we can do that wont affect our response time!
And so yes, we do play volleyball! there is only so much that we can do, can you imagine trying to play football in fire kit and boots!
And what happens after the flying commitment is over... routine servicing of station based resources and endless training so that we do get it right when we are needed. How many other RAF trades can honestly say that they exceed the mandatory 20 hours a month of trade training? or even reach the 20 hours at all?
Like all trades, we have our kids straight from the factory at Manston, and unlike most trades its easy to say who they are and where they work when they make a t^t out of themselves, unfortunately that is a cross that we have to bear as one of the most distinctive trades in the RAF. Every trade in every branch of the armed forces has the same cross to bear also.
A few years ago a station commander of mine insisted that the whole staton took part in a mass 'work experience' program so we all understood each others roles more. We had very few people want to work alongside us and undergo training at 20:00 and later, however those that did take part understood a little more about why we are here, and what we do. Why dont you contact your own RAF fire service and see about doing the same?
Many people in the armed forces never get to do what everyone else thinks they should be doing, but we are all doing our bit in our own trades. This is why I don't get involved with trade bashing, you never know when I may need to call on your services, and vice versa.
As for the photo. Yes They are RAF firefighters. I have served alongside three of them personally. I can't explain the pouches, and I can't justify them either. Like most of you, I think that the position they are in will affect the workings of the rifle, and are therefore more of a danger to the operator, rather than an effective aid. I stand to be corrected however.
Perhaps a little background on the photo might help. We have recently changed our Trade Sponsor, for those that don't know this is the senior officer who overseas the policy and direction of each trade. Our previous TS was a clueless moron. He took the role because it guarantees promotion, and in my opinion has done nothing for the betterment of the trade. He did however, spend a great deal of time emphasising the old adage of 'warfighter first, specialist second'.
It is worth noting that this publicity shot was taken within his last few weeks as TS. In my opinion it smacks of him trying to justify the last two years he has been screwing the trade around. Let's also remember that this is a publicity shot, meaning that it has been set up for reasons that only our PR brethren will understand, and is being marketted for PR and recruitment purposes. I know that this photo was taken at least two weeks after the events it is linked to. I know this because the Flt Sgt (extreme right) was still at the RAF Regiment Depot on embarkation leave at the time of the events and didn't deploy for another two weeks.
Most of us don't really care a great deal for becoming 'infantry'. In fact on most stations your average firefighter will, unless deployed, only handle the rifle once a year for a few hours on CCS. IMHO I don't think that they have deliberately tried to impress people into being something they are not i.e infantry. But they may have been told to give that impression.
Tamecrab - the incident you refer to is briefly mentioned here news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2460271.stm
and in more detail on this page (about 1/4 of the way down)
www.raf.mod.uk/ptc/archive02.html
I expect that pleanty of people will now add a load of posts regarding my trade as nothing but homosexual walts. That is of course your opinion and you are entitled to it, as I am to mine