- 4,051
- 413
- 83
Just been perusing the NYH List and noticed lots of acting rank promotions and lots going down also.
What is the gen?
What is the gen?
There are so many gaps that acting people up has become the norm rather than the exception.Just been perusing the NYH List and noticed lots of acting rank promotions and lots going down also.
What is the gen?
Acting is the norm now and expected from the promotion board, how does acting paid save money? it also shows the shit state of affairs and lack of people.Its also a way of saving money.
And it gives a back door way for the Sqn WO to promote his yes men further adding to the disgust in the promotion system.Acting is the norm now and expected from the promotion board, how does acting paid save money? it also shows the shit state of affairs and lack of people.
Pension contributions would be my guess.how does acting paid save money?
As the same man has input into appraisals which is the ‘front door’ I don’t see the problem. In the main I’ve always found that those who deserved promotion got it.And it gives a back door way for the Sqn WO to promote his yes men further adding to the disgust in the promotion system.
I would be keen to hear your description of the “deserving”?.As the same man has input into appraisals which is the ‘front door’ I don’t see the problem. In the main I’ve always found that those who deserved promotion got it.
I would disagree as I've personally witnessed a useless shit who was barely out of TMT1 before he received Acting SNCO because he was best mates with the Shift Floppy Sausage. As soon as it became public about an hour later, a time served Cpl who had been knocking on the door got up from the group in the Tea Bar, walked to the JPA terminal and 7 Clicked himself out.As the same man has input into appraisals which is the ‘front door’ I don’t see the problem. In the main I’ve always found that those who deserved promotion got it.
Because further down the command chain, a gap is created. I'm not sure if (for example), a Sqn has an acting Sgt to fill a gap, then the Cpl that fills it has their post filled by an SAC, which leaves one SAC slot vacant. Or does the Cpl slot get left vacant?Acting is the norm now and expected from the promotion board, how does acting paid save money? it also shows the shit state of affairs and lack of people.
We have a similar system in our orgabisation Spearmint, where individuals have been given temporary promotion at the whim of the Senior manager instead of through fair and open competition (which it should be). It absolutely destroyed one team as the other Team Leaders effectively downed tools when the yes person was appointed without any formal application process, even though they were the weakest leader of the group. To rub salt into the wound, they appointed another yes person to fill the gap created, again without fair and open competition, and the rest of that grade also went into open revolt. 12 months later, and 8 months after the first individual had stepped down and moved on, there is still a culture of distrust and disharmony in that team, leading to a very low people survey score for them. The new manager came from outside the organisation and is close to quitting on a daily basis, such is the mess that they have inherited. The senior leadership refuse to acknowledge that it was their doing.I would disagree as I've personally witnessed a useless shit who was barely out of TMT1 before he received Acting SNCO because he was best mates with the Shift Floppy Sausage.
Never had acting and it didn’t stop me getting picked up. In fact, I’ve sat on PSBs where acting rank added zero value to the write ups and the individual scored poorly.Acting is the norm now and expected from the promotion board, how does acting paid save money? it also shows the shit state of affairs and lack of people.
Never had acting and it didn’t stop me getting picked up. In fact, I’ve sat on PSBs where acting rank added zero value to the write ups and the individual scored poorly.
No. The SJARs are graded by letters A to C with pluses and minuses. There's an overall letter which does not have to align to the average.I was acting Sgt paid from the end of January 86 after GST 2 until the middle of April 86 after TMT2, in those days there was minimal acting rank except the plods.
Next question.
Do they still give numbers on the F6442 or whatever replaced it?
When I got promoted you were expected to get at least 90 points over 4 years and 93 or 94 was an excellent promotion number.
Sounds like the sort of Acting I seen regularly being 'gifted' to young SAC(T)'s down in MPA on the Herc Fleet. They did **** all to demonstrate suitability other than allowing themselves to be used as a 2nd Sig by 'Management' - even then they couldn't get that stuff right.Thats more down the to the lack of evidence of what they did whilst acting or a badly written SJAR surely?
no its basically what ever way the wind blows, one board its what you do additionally, secondary duties etc, the next its primary duties focused, recently its acting rank, basically a fuc4in lottery. the 6442 system was better and that was sh1t.I was acting Sgt paid from the end of January 86 after GST 2 until the middle of April 86 after TMT2, in those days there was minimal acting rank except the plods.
Next question.
Do they still give numbers on the F6442 or whatever replaced it?
When I got promoted you were expected to get at least 90 points over 4 years and 93 or 94 was an excellent promotion number.