I'm interested in finding out what other shineys and anyone else who cares think about JPA Appraisals. What's good and bad? What will be easier and harder? What pitfalls have people found already and how do you plan to work around them?
The floor is open . . .
I have attended 1 brief and completed the E-Learning package, so by no means an expert but, I must say that my first impressions were good; I like the way it can be passed between subject & RO's (and back) via workflow, I like the fact that there's only 2 narratives to complete as 1st RO also there will be none of the dreaded hastening or losing it in in-trays (I'm sure there'll be some excuses though) however, creation of these reports, at least initially, is going to be an extremely time consuming and tedious task as is the competence profile.
The grading scores will be interesting too. Whilst Orifices & airmen have traditionally had different alpha & numerical scoring systems we will now all be assessed like an old style school report (A-, B+ etc). This will allow a larger range of marks as with the F6442 and whilst initially may reduce over assessment, the creep will soon return.
There will be (sorry, there already has been) loads of teething problems and loads of moans & groans about the system but its going to happen and we might as well get used to it. If it stops the constant tracking/hastening of reports that goes on at the moment thats got to be a good thing but will the time spent raising the reports in the first place outweigh the time saved in tracking/hastening etc?
I think we've only raised 1 report so far so it's too early to let you know of any workrounds/pitfalls etc. I hope however that, like with the intro of JPA, we speak to each other unit to unit and help each other out as a TG otherwise we could be in for some more sledging in these pages!