• Welcome to the E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial RAF Rumour Network.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

More on the F-35

Ex-Bay

SNAFU master
Subscriber
3,817
2
0
Originally from the Jerusalem Post:


Last year Israel ordered an additional 14 F-35s, and the IAF reportedly wishes to expand that order with an additional 17 aircraft.
By all accounts, the F-35 is an impressive next generation fighter. But at the same time, as Aaron Lerner from IMRA news aggregation service noted this week, the F-35 suffers from one major weakness that arguably cancels out all of its advantages. That weakness is the F-35’s operational dependence on software laboratories and logistics support computers located in the US.

In a manner that recalls Apple’s ability to exert perpetual control over all iPhones by making it impossible for them to long function without periodically updating their operating systems, the US has made it impossible for foreign governments to simply purchase F-35s and use them as they see fit.


As Defense-Aerospace.com reported last November, “All F-35 aircraft operating across the world will have to update their mission data files and their Autonomic Logistic Information System (ALIS) profiles before and after every sortie, to ensure that on-board systems are programmed with the latest available operational data and that ALIS is kept permanently informed of each aircraft’s technical status and maintenance requirements.



“ALIS can, and has, prevented aircraft taking off because of an incomplete data file,” the report revealed.


This technical limitation on the F-35s constitutes a critical weakness from Israel’s perspective for two reasons. First, as the Defense-Aerospace article points out, the need to constantly update the ALIS in the US means that the F-35 must be connected to the Internet in order to work. All Internet connections are maintained via fiber optic underwater cables.


Defense-Aerospace cited an article published last October in Wired.com reporting that those cables are “surprisingly vulnerable” to attack.

So it seems that all our F-35's have to clock in to the Pentagon. . . .
 

Barch

Grim Reaper 2016
1000+ Posts
4,054
413
83
As has been said for many years - Control the spares and you control the war.

I bet the men in green growbags don't think of these things when they decide to purchase the latest piece of bling.
 

vim_fuego

Hung Like a Baboon.
Staff member
Administrator
Subscriber
1000+ Posts
12,275
461
83
As has been said for many years - Control the spares and you control the war.

I bet the men in green growbags don't think of these things when they decide to purchase the latest piece of bling.

The people who wear growbags don't purchase aircraft...any aircrew involved in the decision chain (not the evaluation effort) may well have worn the green but only as part of a planned and nurtured career path and for the minimum amount of time to get them quickly through that annoying and time consuming front line bit of the path...
 
Top