G
grumpyoldb
Guest
http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3213_4185192,00.html
McLaren's appeal against the drive-through penalty suffered by Lewis Hamilton has been rejected after it was ruled inadmissible.
Rather than endorse the judgement of the stewards, motorsport's governing body has declared that the team had no right to challenge the ruling.
Although the announcement makes a farce of the decision to hold a hearing - at considerable expense of both time and money - in Paris on Monday, it comes as no great surprise. It was the expected outcome even after the FIA attempted to block McLaren claiming precedent in a team appealing a drive-through penalty by erroneously quoting Tony Scott Andrews as admitting he made a mistake that made the supposed precedent irrelevant.
"Article 152 of the International Sporting Code states that drive-through penalties are 'not susceptible to appeal'," a statement from the FIA's Court of Appeal said on Tuesday.
"The competitor Vodafone McLaren Mercedes appealed the Steward's decision before the International Court of Appeal in a hearing in Paris on September 22nd.
"Having heard the explanations of the parties the Court has concluded that the appeal is inadmissible."
It is unknown how much money was spent in legal and logistical costs to hold the hearing but it is bound to have been in excess of £100,000.
The ruling means that Hamilton, who attended the hearing-that-never-was on Monday, will head into the Singapore GP with just a one-point lead.
McLaren's appeal against the drive-through penalty suffered by Lewis Hamilton has been rejected after it was ruled inadmissible.
Rather than endorse the judgement of the stewards, motorsport's governing body has declared that the team had no right to challenge the ruling.
Although the announcement makes a farce of the decision to hold a hearing - at considerable expense of both time and money - in Paris on Monday, it comes as no great surprise. It was the expected outcome even after the FIA attempted to block McLaren claiming precedent in a team appealing a drive-through penalty by erroneously quoting Tony Scott Andrews as admitting he made a mistake that made the supposed precedent irrelevant.
"Article 152 of the International Sporting Code states that drive-through penalties are 'not susceptible to appeal'," a statement from the FIA's Court of Appeal said on Tuesday.
"The competitor Vodafone McLaren Mercedes appealed the Steward's decision before the International Court of Appeal in a hearing in Paris on September 22nd.
"Having heard the explanations of the parties the Court has concluded that the appeal is inadmissible."
It is unknown how much money was spent in legal and logistical costs to hold the hearing but it is bound to have been in excess of £100,000.
The ruling means that Hamilton, who attended the hearing-that-never-was on Monday, will head into the Singapore GP with just a one-point lead.