• Welcome to the E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial RAF Rumour Network.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

US studies anti-missile system on airlines

P

Pan Warrior

Guest
BAE Systems has reached a contractual agreement with the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to test an infrared aircraft missile defence system on passenger aircraft. If the tests are shown to be compatible with aircraft operation and maintenance they could become standard on all US commercial aircraft within a few years, with Britain and Europe following suit.

The contract, worth $29m (£14.7m) is part of the DHS’s counter-man-portable air defense system (MANPADS) program. BAE will be testing its JETEYE aircraft missile defense system on three American Airlines aircraft. The partnership began in 2004 after growing concern about the vulnerability that commercial airlines have to shoulder fired missiles.

In 2002 members of a group associated with al-Qaida attempted to bring down an Israeli airliner over Kenya with shoulder fired missiles. This spurred DHS and other security groups around the world to invest in technology to protect commercial airlines from such attacks. During takeoff and landing airliners are particulary vulnerable to missile attacks because of their size, low altitude and slower speed.

DHS has previously invested $105m (£53.23m) in the development of countermeasures.

The system is part of BAE’s directable infrared countermeasure technology which is mainly used to protect military aircraft. It could potentially become the first system to be installed on commercial aircraft. Most of the technology used to prevent a missile strike will be taken directly from the countermeasures already being used on military aircraft.

Wonder if any jobs will come of this, ESM, Weapons, surveillance TD on BMI baby or easy jet...!!!:pDT_Xtremez_34:
 

MontyPlumbs

Squadron Cock
Subscriber
1000+ Posts
4,519
4
38
BAE Systems has reached a contractual agreement with the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to test an infrared aircraft missile defence system on passenger aircraft. If the tests are shown to be compatible with aircraft operation and maintenance they could become standard on all US commercial aircraft within a few years, with Britain and Europe following suit.

The contract, worth $29m (£14.7m) is part of the DHS’s counter-man-portable air defense system (MANPADS) program. BAE will be testing its JETEYE aircraft missile defense system on three American Airlines aircraft. The partnership began in 2004 after growing concern about the vulnerability that commercial airlines have to shoulder fired missiles.

In 2002 members of a group associated with al-Qaida attempted to bring down an Israeli airliner over Kenya with shoulder fired missiles. This spurred DHS and other security groups around the world to invest in technology to protect commercial airlines from such attacks. During takeoff and landing airliners are particulary vulnerable to missile attacks because of their size, low altitude and slower speed.

DHS has previously invested $105m (£53.23m) in the development of countermeasures.

The system is part of BAE’s directable infrared countermeasure technology which is mainly used to protect military aircraft. It could potentially become the first system to be installed on commercial aircraft. Most of the technology used to prevent a missile strike will be taken directly from the countermeasures already being used on military aircraft.

Wonder if any jobs will come of this, ESM, Weapons, surveillance TD on BMI baby or easy jet...!!!:pDT_Xtremez_34:

Maybe a job for ex-Plumbers on civvy airways at last haha.
 

wolfy

Warrant Officer
2,270
0
0
BAE Systems has reached a contractual agreement with the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to test an infrared aircraft missile defence system on passenger aircraft. If the tests are shown to be compatible with aircraft operation and maintenance they could become standard on all US commercial aircraft within a few years, with Britain and Europe following suit.

The contract, worth $29m (£14.7m) is part of the DHS’s counter-man-portable air defense system (MANPADS) program. BAE will be testing its JETEYE aircraft missile defense system on three American Airlines aircraft. The partnership began in 2004 after growing concern about the vulnerability that commercial airlines have to shoulder fired missiles.

In 2002 members of a group associated with al-Qaida attempted to bring down an Israeli airliner over Kenya with shoulder fired missiles. This spurred DHS and other security groups around the world to invest in technology to protect commercial airlines from such attacks. During takeoff and landing airliners are particulary vulnerable to missile attacks because of their size, low altitude and slower speed.

DHS has previously invested $105m (£53.23m) in the development of countermeasures.

The system is part of BAE’s directable infrared countermeasure technology which is mainly used to protect military aircraft. It could potentially become the first system to be installed on commercial aircraft. Most of the technology used to prevent a missile strike will be taken directly from the countermeasures already being used on military aircraft.

Wonder if any jobs will come of this, ESM, Weapons, surveillance TD on BMI baby or easy jet...!!!:pDT_Xtremez_34:

Been around for a while now caused a lot of problems with the systems on these aircraft, just surprised its taken this long for the yanks to start down this route.
 
N

NotAnIDOYet

Guest
So if airliners are now to have ant-missile defences fitted how are we supposed to shoot them down in a 9/11 type scenario?

linky
 
Last edited:
153
0
0
Who said we need to shoot em down?

"RAMMING SPEED BIGGLES!"

Jimps


Stop the plonkers getting on board in the first place and if all else fails DIRCM isn't much use against good old cannon shells. Oh sorry I forgot, some (civil servant) (insert personal choice of idiot) decided Teabags don't need a cannon.
 
Top