Interesting one here. A white man is beaten to eath by 3 (Muslim) Asian men. As they walk away one of them is overheard to say "we killed the white man". They then go on to a curry house where they attack both Black and Asian men. The judge in court finds them guilty and they get sentences NLT 15 years a piece. If they had been charged under the new Racism laws, they would have been given sentences NLT 30 years. The judges reasoning is that they attacked other cultures and not just a white man. On the radio is a Muslim woman and a white man arguing about this case, one says it was wrong and they should have been done under the Racism laws, the other says no, because of the attacks on the other men. It isin't mentioned whether the other Asians are Hindu or Sikh, as this would make it a (potentially) Racist attack. However what makes it interesting is the person supporting the lesser sentence is the white man, the Muslim woman is appauled that these men were not tried under the new Racism laws. It seems to me to bode well for our multi cultural society that we are seeing the support of a Muslim woman against, what is simply, her own culture and yet a white, male, liberal, do-gooding apologist is not prepared to stand up and say "well actually yes, this was racist and these people should be sentenced accordingly". We see far to many cases wher some poor Black or Asian guy gets killed and it becomes a "racist" attack, even though the thugs that did it would probably do the smae to a white guy who didn't agree with their way of thinking. Without turning this into a BNP recruiting stand, any (sensible) comments out there?