• Welcome to the E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial RAF Rumour Network.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Search results

  1. G

    Multi-skilling

    Why? Seems like a good idea but without the funding to co-locate the maintenance facilities and such a diverse equipment set to rectify/maintain the future looks poor. The fact that DWR TRTs are quicker for legacy MT Techs says it all. Sending legacy tradesmen into specific post defeats the...
  2. G

    500 More troops for Afghan

    500 more troops for Afghan. Its bad enough getting there by AT now let alone with another 500. I guess the press will be saying the Army will take the brunt of it but not take into account what the RAF does in support. More AT, more AC support for front line, more airfield equipment support...
  3. G

    Hello again

    Thought I would re-introduce myself after the little problem!! I'll start as I mean to go on. I hate amlagamation, especially those heavys who want a real trade!! I like the madness and banter!! Merry Xmas!!:PDT_Xtremez_28:
7,553members
43,631threads
595,805posts
84online users
Top