I was watching "Guess the year" on VH1 (bear with me I do have a point!) As the music plays they give little snippets of info on the bottom of the page to assist in your guessing. One of them that came up was "River Phoenix tragically dies of a drug overdose outside the Viper rooms". Now my point is (at last I hear you mutter) Do you thinkthis is "tragic", Aberfan was tragic, Heisal stadium was tragic, "Challenger" was tragic. Is a rich, spoiled, feted, ferkwit, who shoves a poison in their arms or up their noses entitled to our sympathy when it is a well known fact that drugs are addictive and willkill you if used to excess or for too long. Some poor uneducated kid hooked by scum drug peddlers may get my sympathy, in many ways they are stuck in a circle of 5hit, stealing or prostituting themselves for their next fix, but the well off, famous cnuts, as far as I am concerned can die screaming in agony, they perpetuate the myth that any kind of substance abuse is "cool". I remember as a kid, lads at my school buying LSD tabs for 10p (this in the days when 20 fags were 25p) I know that one went on to harder stuff and is now dead and another has pyschiatric problems to this day. Would anyone here give a to55 if Docherty and Moss died with a needle in their arms, and why is that soft biatch still employed? What message does its send the young lasses (of which I am a dad to one)
Rant Off.
Rant Off.