• Welcome to the E-Goat :: The Totally Unofficial RAF Rumour Network.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

ICT Tech SAC-Cpl Board 2009

hugo_a_go_go

Corporal
290
0
0
(scratches head) They were told they were 95, so duff gen somewhere afoot. In any case, they are up in the 90's, should anyone be interested.

Cheers Hugo.


Thanks for that...................spoke to PMA after the board was ratified and i have two SAC's in the 90's. One 95 and the other is now a bit confused as is 93 ??

"Service Requirement" re-shuffling at its best then :pDT_Xtremez_06:
 
44
0
0
I seen on the Manning bulletin that we got in last week that they could be looking for 141 now. If it gets that high is another story though.
 
S

Shitehawk

Guest
way out with their estimate then............or a $hite load of people have turned it down

Or there will be a BIG batch of sub standard cpls who wouldnt have made the grade normally hitting the streets soon.
 

Million

LAC
3
0
0
Or there will be a BIG batch of sub standard cpls who wouldnt have made the grade normally hitting the streets soon.

Aren't all A grades promotable now?!! Doesn't mean they're substandard, may not have kissed as much ass as others!!!!

Interested in what manning bulletin this was that shows an increase in the quota? Nothing on manning website.
 
44
0
0
Aren't all A grades promotable now?!! Doesn't mean they're substandard, may not have kissed as much ass as others!!!!

Interested in what manning bulletin this was that shows an increase in the quota? Nothing on manning website.

Yeah its not on the manning website strangely, though we got an e-mail sent from our Chf Clk and it had all the info about recent boards that have just sat and info on boards plus 6 months. was a PMA Bulletin dated 17 Jun 10
 

PVRisthefuture

Sergeant
471
0
0
Or there will be a BIG batch of sub standard cpls who wouldnt have made the grade normally hitting the streets soon.

Because all Cpl's, Sgt's et al before this board have been tip top...

Does B grades mean they're crap, or not done enough years in rank, or not raised enough charity money for this years assessment (not cynical...)?

Statements like that only belittle your standing in any debate. One presumes you have been promoted?
 
Top